Humanism vs. Authoritarianism in Education: LFM Reviews Monsieur Lazhar

By Patricia Ducey. Oh, Canada! Every so often, out from beneath the ice and snow of our northern neighbor, emerges a film so en pointe that it seems intended for an American audience. Like The Barbarian Invasions, another French Canadian offering, with its stinging comparison of Canada’s health system to ours, Monsieur Lazhar takes on education — and the well meaning but destructive political correctness that apparently stultifies both our systems. But beyond the concerns of the day, Monsieur Lazhar resonates in the tradition of school teacher movies from The Children’s Hour to Stand and Deliver, embracing the light and dark tones of both – and is totally affecting, earning its many Canadian awards and nomination for the Academy’s Best Foreign Film Oscar.

Algerian-born comedian and humorist Mohamed Fellag stars as Bachir Lazhar, the substitute teacher in a Montreal grade school class that recently lost its beloved teacher Martine through suicide, a death seen as even more horrific because she hanged herself in the classroom where she knew the children would find her. The story opens as Lazhar, an asylum seeker from Algeria, interviews for a substitute teacher position with the school’s principal, Mme. Vaillancourt (Danielle Proulx). He has read about the teacher’s death in the paper and presents his CV to the harried principal.

She soon hires him and he begins his work with the bereaved class. First off, he is mystified by the classroom setup, where all the desks form little semi-circles to enhance the team approach to learning (to avoid any child being shamed by giving a wrong answer). He orders the desks rearranged in orderly rows. Each child is now an individual again, on his or her own – which awkward use of the personal pronoun brings me to Lazhar’s next problem. In a grammar lesson the children school him on the “new” system of pronouns they must use – pure edu-babble – to what end, he cannot fathom but he accedes. The school psychologist arrives, and chides him to leave the handling of grief that bubbles up unbidden from the children to her, as if this human and empathetic activity could not possibly be managed by a non-professional. Finally, a boy acts up in class, and Lazhar cuffs him lightly on the cheek. This is the straw that breaks the camel’s back, and the principal brings him in for a meeting, where she informs him of modern educational rules – among them, no touching of a child, ever — not even to put sunscreen on a child, as the gym teacher recounts.

But Bachir’s students thrive in the new, structured environment. More importantly, they trust the empathy that comes from his heart and from his experience. The adults, who are “freaking out” more than the kids, apply and misapply silly nostrums that ultimately make the kids feel worse. But his story and the kids’ grief are connected, and we learn more about the troubled boy Simon and his connection to the tragic Martine, and of Bachir and the reason that he is alone in Montreal. Suffice it to say that he and his family fell victim to another system that repressed and forbade certain kinds of speech and carried that diktat to calamitous ends. He knows all too well what lies at the end of this utopian vision, and eventually he must decide where he will draw the line. As they come together, both stories echo the themes of the movie, both personal and political.

Philippe Falardeau, who won the Canadian best director for this film – and deservedly so – suppresses any tendency towards cuteness or sentimentality, with a totally naturalistic look and feel of a wintry Montreal. His actors do not appear fussed over by stylists or makeup staff, and they seem to live and work in cluttered, lived in spaces. In addition, he wisely pulls back the dialogue and direction when histrionics or sappiness would have been easy, yet this subtle and understated style makes the eventual impact even more transcendent.

Mohamed Fellag as Bachir Lazhar.

Fellag is endearing, sometimes humorous, and conveys much emotion with the lift of an eyebrow. Sophie Nélisse as Alice and Émilien Néron as Simon, the children who discover the teacher’s body, rise to equal footing with Fellag and the other adults with performances so artful and natural that Falardeau and his young actors must be commended. (Here Falardeau talks with critic Dan Persons about the film, and gives what amounts to a master class in directing children. Hollywood directors, take a listen.)

The film does indeed honor the power of the student-teacher relationship, its power to heal and to inspire, but it also calls into question the folly of the authoritarian impulse that undergirds so much of education today. In the end, Bachir stands for humanism and, paradoxically perhaps, order. They hinge one upon the other – he knows that one child is not interchangeable with another, and that each child flourishes best in an atmosphere of basic order paired with open, honest communication. The movie ends fittingly with Bachir’s final act of defiance against the regime — a small act, but one perfectly in keeping with his larger lesson to the kids that “a classroom is a place of friendship, of work, of courtesy, a place of life.”

Posted on April 17th, 2012 at 3:19pm.

Colin Farrell: The Restoration

Colin Farrell in the new "Total Recall."

By Patricia Ducey. Now that the trailer for the remake of Total Recall is out, I thought about Colin Farrell and the trajectory of his career – how the actor once more famous for his partying than his acting climbed his way back to blockbuster status again, now reprising Arnold Schwarzenegger’s iconic role. How did he get from Alexander to Quaid? [See Colin Farrell discuss the new Total Recall here.]

Farrell’s international career ignited when he, a Dublin native and actor in both Ireland and on the BBC, was cast by Joel Schumacher in Tigerland (2000) as Bozz, an edgy Texan army recruit. His smoldering good looks and credible Texas twang in the film made Hollywood sit up and take notice. With his Irish charm, his reputation for four letter words, and rebelliousness — plus his nudity in Tigerland — Farrell soon became known as much for his off-screen antics as for his roles, and for a while he was the enfant terrible of the film world. A blur of big roles followed Tigerland: he co-starred opposite Bruce Willis in Hart’s War, played Jesse James in American Outlaws, and worked with Steven Spielberg on Minority Report. He shot to the top of the acting world, and landed the cover of Vanity Fair — all before he was 25.

Colin Farrell in "Tigerland."

Then Farrell donned that platinum blond wig (but kept his Irish accent) for the title role in Oliver Stone’s unfortunate Alexander in 2004. Nominated for six Razzies, the movie was rejected by critics and moviegoers alike. He quickly went to work on a remake of Miami Vice, then collapsed at the wrap party and checked into rehab. Miami Vice collapsed, too.

Farrell had offended the lords of fame and cinema: his movies bombed, and his x–rated exploits felt, well, exploitative. He didn’t work much. And although many Hollywood notables who burn the flame at both ends never make it back (like Stone himself, still wandering in the desert after Alexander), Farrell did. In a series of small but memorable roles over the past five to six years, Farrell worked steadily and garnered attention for all the right reasons. By honing his affecting acting skills and leaving the bad-boy persona behind, he moved forward.

In four roles, especially — John Smith in The New World, Ray in In Bruges, Valka in The Way Back, and as Bobby Pellitt in Horrible Bosses — Farrell played against his good looks and roguish charm (and his much ballyhooed craic-loving ways) to create indelible characters instead.

When he read the script to In Bruges, for instance, he loved it. But he warned Martin McDonagh, the director, “I don’t think you should hire me. I come with a certain amount of baggage that has been well earned through the years and this piece is so pure, I would love the audience to not have too much of a relationship with any of the actors.” Luckily, McDonagh disagreed and hired him. The result is the character of Ray, a hit man who violates his own moral code by killing an innocent and who spends the rest of the film trying to expiate his guilt. Strangely, and thanks to Farrell’s portrayal, we root for him to do just that.

After Bruges Farrell played Valka, a Russian gangster in The Way Back (a film often written about here at Libertas, see here and here), another “minor” character with a believable, multifaceted identity. Valka admires toughness and demands it of others. With a tattoo of Stalin on his chest to honor one of Russia’s “tough men,” he eschews self-pity — “grateful is for dogs” — and doesn’t quit until he reaches the border. Turns out he is not so tough after all, though. At the border he realizes he can’t leave Russia, his beloved homeland –  and as for freedom, he “wouldn’t know what to do with it.” Another deftly created character with just the right touch of saint and sinner.

Farrell in "The New World."

On the comedic side, in Horrible Bosses Farrell undergoes a complete physical transformation as Bobby Pellitt, the obnoxious son of the boss. Vanity be damned, Farrell morphs into one of the most comically unlikable characters ever, yet the fierceness of Bobby’s lust for power (plus an almost heroically bad comb-over) earn our admiration.

But the first I saw of Farrell after his burnout was his role as Captain John Smith in Terrence Malick’s The New World. I was frankly surprised by the seriousness of his work – and his willingness to subsume himself into Malick’s ensemble – instead of dominating the screen. This was definitely not a star turn. In New World Farrell captures us without speaking — dialogue is always sparse in a Malick film — first as the rebel explorer, and then as Smith the man in love. I sought out Farrell’s films after that, and the string of memorable portrayals continued.

I’ve enjoyed him so much in these “supporting” roles that I almost hate to see him in the lead – of a blockbuster, no less – once again. Almost. By now he’s tucked the baggage away and earned his standing as a leading man. In the new trailer we can guess that his Total Recall is going to be different, with a vulnerability and emotional depth as evident as in his previous work. There’s a soul, not a cyborg, behind those eyes — and somehow I don’t think the stardust will blind him this time.

Posted on April 3rd, 2012 at 2:26pm.

TNT’s Southland: In Praise of the Civic Virtues

TNT, Tuesdays at 10 p.m.

By Patricia Ducey. There’s a spot on L.A.’s 101 freeway near Vignes Street where, if you look up at the right time of day, you can see the silhouettes of a half dozen or so helicopters–the LAPD air support unit–on the roof of their headquarters on Ramirez Street. It’s an awe-inspiring, fearsome sight. I get the same vibe at Southland’s opening credit roll. A series of sepia-toned photos of local crime scenes scrolls by, starting with the muzzle of a very large gun aimed straight at you, buddy, by a grinning 1960s-era L.A. cop. Against the slideshow are the martial tones of Martin Davich’s theme music of thumping bass and staccato drumbeats, that telegraphs a clear message: bad guys beware. This is Los Angeles, the mythic Los Angeles of TNT’s ever improving and innovative Southland.

Yet, as unapologetically fierce as the opening sequence may be, Southland is more about the power of ideas than power for its own sake. The body count is remarkably low, and the cops spend as much time talking to their citizens as busting them. In contrast to the patricians of Law & Order who fought the forces of chaos in the rarified air of law courts, or the wonky CSI techs in sterile labs, Southland‘s cops attack cases and problems from the bottom up, at street level. These L.A. cops aim to restore character, as well as order, to the beat. Call it nation building in L.A., if you will. And thanks to rich, layered writing, non-PC characters and fresh production style, we come to believe – like these cops – that they might just pull it off.

From the opening credit sequence.

John Wells of ER tapped NYPD Blues veteran Ann Biderman to create the show and she rode along with the LAPD for several months to immerse herself in its culture. The resulting writing is so rich in detail that even the smallest scene is not wasted; each detail adds heft to the character or storyline. Her characters have mastered the nuances of every gang, every drug network, and every neighborhood from the West Side to Boyle Heights. As the detectives search an alley for evidence, for instance, a drug addict ambles by, listing from left to right in precarious fashion. “Don’t worry,” the veteran replies matter-of-factly to the rookie’s alarm, “they never fall down.” And he doesn’t, much to the surprise of the rookie. The officers eat lunch at real fast food joints or taco stands and chat endlessly about where to eat, to alleviate the monotony of an uneventful patrol. They solve a business dispute between a drug dealer and his buyer and defend a transvestite business owner from local bullies. They break up at least one marital fight per episode. They crack jokes—about each other, about the crazies they meet. And it’s all compelling—we are never sure what is going to happen next.

Southland’s characters defy neat types, as well. The centerpiece of this ensemble is the partnership between rookie Ben Sherman and his training officer, John Cooper, who spends the first couple of episodes training—hazing, really—the rookie from Beverly Hills. But Ben takes it, eventually winning Coop’s respect when he expertly guns down a gangbanger, saving fellow officer Dewey’s life. “Where did you learn to shoot like that,” they exclaim. “Beverly Hills Gun Club,” he coolly responds. And as the series progresses, Ben’s story unfolds. He is not just a rich kid engaging in cop tourism; his own family was terrorized by a criminal client of his criminal defense lawyer father. And Cooper is not the chubby-cheeked bully out to vent his angst on the mean streets, as he first appeared.

Michael Cudlitz & Lucy Liu in "Southland."

Now we are in Season 4 and Coop has overcome an addiction to pain pills that started with treatment for his aching back. He finally states that yes, he is gay, trying to calm a gay teen who has been viciously bullied. Ben registers no surprise, but at first we are not sure if this is just another story he tells to calm down a distraught victim. Thinking back, we realize of course that he’s gay but Southland has rolled out the story of his sexual identity in gradual hints, as they did with other characters, with no exploitation.

Southland pokes fun at overused or politically correct TV police tropes, as well; they even call Ben “Tori Spelling.” They tell nice, sweet stories to victims to comfort them—Detective Lydia Adam’s partner gets almost teary-eyed at one until she tells him that she just made it up. In another episode, a man is stabbed to death at a convenience market; the victim happens to be the witness whose testimony helped send man to prison for life. That man has just been released thanks to new DNA evidence, but the new partner resists Lydia’s notion that he is the killer. After all he’s suffered! After she doggedly interviews him and gets a search warrant she recovers bloody clothes and the murder weapon in the recently freed man’s house. Her new partner is stunned. “I’m not surprised,” she shrugs. More reversals of the trite include a watch commander opening roll call with the sardonic announcement that crime has gone up dramatically now that the courts have released so many prisoners. In another, a hipster in a Smart Car is made to look the fool against Cooper’s cool. Southland‘s stories seem real and original, against the grain of the usual police drama pieties.

Michael Cudlitz & Ben McKenzie in "Southland."

But it’s Officer Sammy Bryant’s character that illustrates the “message” (if any) this LAPD is sending. Sammy is the voice that exhorts the people of L.A. to step up and take back their city from the thugs. As fearless and aggressive as he is, he knows that the police can’t keep the peace alone. In Season 1, he urges three teenage girls to testify in a gang murder case. Sweet naïve Janila, in the throes of LAPD hero worship, agrees – if they promise to get her into the Explorers. An irate citizen tells Sammy he is filing a complaint against him for insensitivity at the scene of a crime; Sammy shouts back that he ought to think about helping the police if he wants peace on his street. That stops the complainant short, as if he had never considered the idea. And so the citizen testifies. In the latest episode, though, Sammy may have gone too far: an anguished father curses and punches Sammy in the courthouse hall. Sammy had convinced his son to testify against a gang and the gang killed him. It will be interesting to see where Sammy’s character goes; up until now, his informants have escaped retaliation.

Despite the murder and mayhem, Southland’s L.A. is broken but unbowed. There’s something essentially noble and optimistic that the show communicates. One thinks of Sammy’s aggressive, passionate jeremiads about stepping up, or the constant jokes and pranks to leaven the deadly tension, or Cooper’s masterful techniques to calm domestic fights. These cops are parents in a family of a million children who have lost their way – raised by the wolves of permissiveness and family breakdown – and they do all they can to stand these citizens up and point them in the right direction.

Every series has an arc, and when the arc plays out, the series loses steam. Yet Southland is still in its ascendancy with many stories yet to be revealed. I hope we get to see Janila taking the LAPD cadet oath, which starts with the pledge: “I do solemnly declare upon my honor. . .” For all her naïveté, this call to honor – embodied by Sammy and his comrades – may yet save her from the cheap thrills of the streets. I for one will be watching.

Posted on February 29th, 2012 at 11:00am.

LFM Reviews Act of Valor

By Patricia Ducey. Act of Valor, a fine movie opening this weekend about the Navy SEALs, looks to crush its box office competitors, with Tyler Perry’s latest in second, and assorted rom-coms and thrillers trailing far, far behind.

Small wonder.

Valor’s non-stop action and gut-twisting suspense, based on real SEAL missions and starring present day SEALs, grabs us by the throat and doesn’t let go for nearly two hours. What makes Valor especially compelling throughout is its grounding in SEAL values like courage, patriotism, and family—their dedication to something bigger than themselves underpins all the action—supplying a much needed corrective to years of equivocal or downright ugly depictions of our military in Hollywood films. In Act of Valor our warriors stand tall as ever.

The action begins when jihadi mastermind Abu Shabal (Jason Cottle) detonates a bomb in a Philippine schoolyard, killing a U.S. ambassador, along with many other innocents, as he fetches his son from school. Soon after, a CIA agent (Nestor Serrano) is killed and his partner Morales (Roselyn Sanchez) is kidnapped from a Costa Rican apartment when their investigation of a drug smuggler named Christo goes awry. The savvy Christo showers the town with his largesse, thus ensuring their loyalty, and the townspeople out the operatives.

The SEALs are called in to recover Morales before it’s too late, and after a last get-together with their families, the Bandito Platoon are off to the jungle. They rescue Morales after a harrowing battle and recover intel that reveals Christo has teamed up with Shabal, who intends to smuggle suicide bombers into the U.S. And they will be wearing a new kind of weapon: ultra thin suicide vests with explosives made of ceramic that will sail through any metal detector and wreak unimaginable damage. If the bombers succeed at detonating at malls and stadiums, the casualties and the ensuing panic could destroy the U.S. economy. So the SEALs press on, crisscrossing the globe to stop the plot, mixing astonishing feats of skill and bravery with military technology unimaginable ten years ago. SEALs rendezvous with submarines; helos drop in boats and teams to inaccessible jungle rivers. It’s incredible stuff. Valor looks a little like 24 thanks to its screen graphics, and the action shifts from Costa Rica to the Ukraine and to the U.S., and from team to team. The cinematography and expert editing add to the heart-pumping suspense.

Yet this realistic film, which started as a recruiting short, has been criticized by some as ‘propaganda.’ Unfortunately, filmmakers today are between a rock and a hard place; if they conscientiously steer away from old, stereotypical racial tropes or political jingoism, that leaves them no alternative but to ‘stereotype’ whoever is left– and as Pogo said, “We have met the enemy and he is us.” Always us. Yet surely anti-military tropes have exhausted themselves; movies like Avatar and Redacted and even Hurt Locker posit a dystopian military culture as ‘the enemy,’ an enemy that the public largely does not buy into any more.

So where all this handwringing has left us is at the tedious notion of ‘balance,’ which requires that if one presents a positive image of the military, as Valor does, one is also required to add a negative one in order to achieve ‘balance’ – or else one is otherwise left with mere ‘propaganda.’ Yet realistically, how would this work out? In real life SEALs are so highly trained and vetted that it would prove a ridiculous stretch to ‘balance’ Act of Valor out with the usual stock neurotics or savages who so often appear in military films made by Hollywood.

Navy SEALs flying in to save the day in "Act of Valor."

All of this narrative confusion and timidity often leaves critics cringing at movies with a pro-American point of view. But does anyone seriously question whether single-minded pursuit of terrorists is a bad thing, or that the SEALs’ success springs from a profound sense of patriotism? Surely these are unequivocal matters. And besides, ask our own president how he feels about the ‘nuances’ or ‘complexities’ of the missions he sends SEALs on.

The charge of ‘propaganda’ also implies that this movie is lying to us – but this charge fails, as well. You don’t believe a SEAL would fall on a grenade to save others? See Michael Monsoor. Chechen terrorists killing schoolchildren? Beslan. Amazing technology and team precision? The bin Laden raid.

The Navy has concealed nothing about their involvement in the movie (after all, they commissioned it) and acknowledged that they wanted a realistic version of their mostly secret missions out in the public to aid recruitment.

And the SEALs know better than we that the War on Terror has been a long 10 years.

Roselyn Sanchez in "Act of Valor."

The real life SEAL actors, who are identified only by their first names for security reasons, are put to good use. Many critics have assailed the SEALs’ acting here as ‘wooden,’ but I find their calm professionalism under fire more believable and fresh than the histrionics supplied by actors. In fact, it may even help; instead of thinking “I wonder if he’s stoned” while watching a Charlie Sheen or a Demi Moore chew up the scenery, we’re thinking “they’re the real deal!” (And ladies, these SEALs are awfully easy on the eyes.) In any case, this is an action film; an action movie foregrounds the, er, action, not the personal stories. Still, several scenes certainly stand up to the acting in a TV show or film; for example, I loved the “another day at the office” banter of the comrades-in-arms, and several scenes, like the Chief’s interrogation of the suspect Christo, were crisp and compelling. In any case, story and heart trump slick production values every time.

Finally, the voiceover by one of the SEALs that bookends the film explains how and why these SEALS bond to each and to their country so deeply, sentiments they don’t have time to reveal in the midst of battle. At the conclusion, the narrator reads a letter written by one SEAL to his son, to be read in the event of his death. He talks about what his own father taught him in an effort to guide his son to manhood, setting forth guiding principles should he not be there to remind him. I won’t spoil it for you, but his advice is eloquent and wise, something worth reading to any kid.

As the movie fades out, we see a roster of names, much too long, of SEALs who have made the ultimate sacrifice since 9/11. Yes, it has been a long ten years for our military men and women. Yet they continue to live and die for us, in the shadows until now, reminding us in the final Tacitus quote adopted by warriors for centuries: “In Valor There is Hope.” Now, that is hope we can believe in.

Posted on February 26th, 2012 at 12:38pm.

LFM Review: War Horse

By Patricia Ducey. War Horse opens with a rapturous aerial shot of the rolling Devon hills, dotted with neat farms and hedgerows and so achingly verdant that it takes one’s breath away. Soon that transcendent vision of the land as another Eden or demi-paradise gives way to the more intimate image of a mare giving birth in a meadow below, while young Albert Narricott (Jeremy Irvine) watches spellbound from just outside the fence. As the satin-coated foal finds his legs and gambols about, we realize that in one short minute we, like Albert, have fallen totally in love with the spirited youngster. And we know, sadly, something Albert doesn’t: that this idyll will soon be smashed to smithereens.

War Horse‘s story is set in England at the moment before World War I breaks out. In one prideful moment, lovable ne’er-do- well tenant farmer Ted Narricott bids against his hated landlord for the now mature horse at auction. His son Albert is thrilled that his father has brought home the object of his years’ affection and names the horse Joey, but mother Rose (Emily Watson) insists that the horse be sold; a horse as fine as this one must be worthless as a working animal. Albert insists he can train the noble half-thoroughbred to pull a plow; in those desperate economic times, they must plow and plant a rocky field to pay the rent on the farm. The horse soon learns his trade and earns his keep, but a storm later destroys the hard won crop. Thus, finally, Albert’s father Ted (Pete Mullan) is forced to sell the horse. War has broken out, and the British Army snaps up the beautiful animal for its officer corps. Albert bids farewell to his beloved horse – and, for the next hour, we see through Joey’s almond-colored eyes his wartime ordeal on the march to the front lines, all the way to the gut wrenching trench warfare and the terrible climax in No Man’s Land.

War Horse was adapted by British writers Lee Hall (Billy Elliott) and Richard Curtis from a young adult novel, and then Tony-winning play, by British author Michael Morpurgo, which told the story of the Great War through the eyes of a horse and the family that owns him and seemingly loses him. Reportedly, Spielberg saw the play and sewed up the movie deal the next day, even though the schedule interfered with his Tin Tin project.

Jeremy Irvine as Albert, with Joey.

This being a Spielberg film, and a Young Adult offering, sometimes it claws at your heartstrings when a tug would do, and at 146 minutes, is far too long—a few subplots and scenes could be trimmed, to perhaps leave time to explore Albert’s emotional journey as well. The look and sound of the film experience, though, is flawless, thanks in part to Spielberg’s long-time collaborators, cinematographer Janusz Kaminski and production designer Rick Carter, who breathe fire into the director’s storyboards. Their War Horse must be seen as his team’s masterpiece–if 35 mm film is to give way totally to digital, as Kaminski believes, his work here will remain one of its crowning achievements. The magnificent landscapes of Devon, dwarfing its inhabitants, the shimmer of wind through a grove of trees in an eerie pre-battle silence, are but a few of many memorable shots. And special mention must be made of Spielberg’s initial battle scene, when the English mounted battalion charges a German camp. The visual and aural effects are simply spectacular, the sequence a harrowing reminder that men once rode into battle with sabers unleashed, atop steeds at a thundering gallop, straight into an enemy line, and then drew enemy blood in face-to-face combat. And like the classic films he emulates, Spielberg used thousands of extras and hundreds of horses in the battle scenes: no CGI shortcuts here.

Real battle re-enactments: no CGI shortcuts here.

The actors acquit themselves well, and Jeremy Irvine as Albert is affecting. The horse, though, is the star here. Joey is played by several horses, mostly by an American horse named Finder, who also played Seabiscuit. I hope there is an Oscar category for Finder and his trainer, because the horse’s ability to communicate with Albert and with an Army stallion he bonds with is enchanting.

Steven Spielberg delivers here a masterful coming-of-age story, in which the hero’s mettle is tested by war and privation in a world where character is all that remains and all that matters after everything else has been taken. So this is not a cynical or post-modern film; some people may even call the PG-13 War Horse sentimental.  The hipster in your life might insist his sniffles are sniffs of disdain, but in all of history, from the renderings in Chauvet Cave to the little girls (like me once) who sketched profiles of ponies in her notebook in history class, there has always been something about a human that loves a horse. War Horse rightfully earns top tier status in this genre.

So if you or your young adult plans to see War Horse, get thee to the multiplex. This is a film that must be seen in a proper theater, not in a  living room, to appreciate its many gifts.

Posted on January 5th, 2011 at 6:53pm.

LFM Review: The Descendants

From "The Descendants."

By Patricia Ducey. Early on in The Descendants, the camera sweeps lovingly over the old family portraits that line the walls of Matt King’s Oahu den. His forebearers, among them a landed Hawaiian princess and her Caucasian husband – along with their many ambitious, high achieving progeny – stare back at us radiating a self-possession and grandness we soon realize is sorely missing from Matt’s present day world.

Matt King (George Clooney) practices law and lives a middle class existence on Oahu with his family, a wife and two daughters, whom he barely relates to. He and his many cousins are heirs to the huge coastline land grant left to them by their royal and self-made ancestors – but the law mandates that they must now dissolve the trust, so they must sell the huge estate to who they decide as a family is the best buyer. The meeting will take place soon. Oh yes, I think hopefully, this will be grand: a large, wealthy family in conflict as they grapple with the meaning of legacy and of the land in this last piece of American wilderness.

But then Payne switches to Matt’s domestic crisis; his wife Elizabeth after a boating accident lies in a coma, and weak, ineffectual Matt must rise to the role of father and husband –because the one parent who made the family work is unconscious. As the family story takes over, Payne, the visual poet of Middle America and middle age, goes a bit sideways; his excursion into the tropical Eden and Matt’s discontent is not as successful as his previous films. In Election, About Schmidt, and Sideways his Midwestern protagonists feel the dissatisfactions of less than fully lived lives out there in flyover country, but they eventually claw their way out of despair through action or love.

Matt King is not so lucky, or perhaps not so brave. He retrieves his wanton teenage daughter Alexandra (Shailene Woodley) from the boarding school that is attempting, unsuccessfully, to reform her. Matt is determined that he and Alexandra, and younger girl Scottie (Amara Miller), will face the end of Elizabeth’s life together as a family. The doctor has informed him her coma is hopeless; they will remove the breathing tube per Elizabeth’s prior instructions. Both girls are bratty and foul mouthed; they humiliate and disobey their father just for the pure sport of it — because in his bumbling immaturity he allows them to, playing the ineffectual father to their faux maturity. In short, they represent the now clichéd American family, Hollywood version.

From "The Descendants."

Alexandra is particularly angry with her mother, and she finally tells her father why: her mother was having an affair — something Matt, in his detachment, never even remotely suspected. Finally, Matt is furious; he confronts Elizabeth’s friends and they reveal his identity. He knows this is his chance to step up as man of action. Instead, he enlists daughter Alexandra’s help to find the man and confront him! This is something a teenager would do — and why would a man involve his daughter in the pathetic exercise of stalking her mother’s lover? Surely all hell will break loose, I surmise, and Matt will see his errors and grow up. Alas, when he and Alexandra find the hapless lover, Matt instead gives him a good talking to and then invites him to visit his dying wife in the hospital, despite the fact that the lover admits that for him the affair was not serious. At this point, I emotionally checked out. Even the plain spoken eloquence of Robert Forster as Elizabeth’s father, and the crackling life force of Woodley’s Alexandra were not enough to sustain this movie. Continue reading LFM Review: The Descendants