<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Classic Cinema Obsession: Godard&#8217;s Vivre Sa Vie</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.libertasfilmmagazine.com/classic-cinema-obsession-godards-vivre-sa-vie/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.libertasfilmmagazine.com/classic-cinema-obsession-godards-vivre-sa-vie/</link>
	<description>LFM: The Voice of Freedom in Movies &#38; Pop Culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 05:08:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer Baldwin</title>
		<link>http://www.libertasfilmmagazine.com/classic-cinema-obsession-godards-vivre-sa-vie/comment-page-1/#comment-312</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Baldwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 17:46:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libertasfilmmagazine.com/?p=2619#comment-312</guid>
		<description>Thank you for the wonderful comments!

Maria Falconetti is like some kind of wonderful, heartbreaking spirit from another world.  If IMDB is to be trusted, she makes something like three movies in her entire movie career, then has her greatest performance in THE PASSION OF JOAN OF ARC.  She seems to actually *become* Joan of Arc in that film (or at least channels the spirit of that great saint), and then disappears from the screen forever.  Everything about that film is tinged with a strange supernatural aura for me.

VIVRE SA VIE, of course, is much more earthbound, but Anna Karina is a goddess.  I agree with you Claude:  Bardot is fun in a sexy sex kitten kinda way, but Karina is on another level entirely.  She has mystery.

Prehistoric Woman, I&#039;m glad you brought up the Louise Brooks style of Nana&#039;s hair.  This is just another one of Godard&#039;s references to the cinema, probably a shout-out to Brooks&#039;s character in PANDORA&#039;S BOX.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the wonderful comments!</p>
<p>Maria Falconetti is like some kind of wonderful, heartbreaking spirit from another world.  If IMDB is to be trusted, she makes something like three movies in her entire movie career, then has her greatest performance in THE PASSION OF JOAN OF ARC.  She seems to actually *become* Joan of Arc in that film (or at least channels the spirit of that great saint), and then disappears from the screen forever.  Everything about that film is tinged with a strange supernatural aura for me.</p>
<p>VIVRE SA VIE, of course, is much more earthbound, but Anna Karina is a goddess.  I agree with you Claude:  Bardot is fun in a sexy sex kitten kinda way, but Karina is on another level entirely.  She has mystery.</p>
<p>Prehistoric Woman, I&#8217;m glad you brought up the Louise Brooks style of Nana&#8217;s hair.  This is just another one of Godard&#8217;s references to the cinema, probably a shout-out to Brooks&#8217;s character in PANDORA&#8217;S BOX.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prehistoric Woman</title>
		<link>http://www.libertasfilmmagazine.com/classic-cinema-obsession-godards-vivre-sa-vie/comment-page-1/#comment-304</link>
		<dc:creator>Prehistoric Woman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jun 2010 22:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libertasfilmmagazine.com/?p=2619#comment-304</guid>
		<description>Anna Karina is lovely, and Maria Falconetti moved me a great deal too when I saw &quot;The Passion of Joan of Arc&quot; some years ago.  It is incredible to think that was her first screen role - and also, I believe, her last because Dreyer put her through so much making it.  Anyway, I will take a look at &quot;Vivre Sa Ve.&quot;  I like your photo selection and I&#039;m curious about how Godard handles Karina&#039;s character.  Also I like her fuzzy black coat too!  (And Karina&#039;s haircut is very chic as well - very Louis Brooks.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anna Karina is lovely, and Maria Falconetti moved me a great deal too when I saw &#8220;The Passion of Joan of Arc&#8221; some years ago.  It is incredible to think that was her first screen role &#8211; and also, I believe, her last because Dreyer put her through so much making it.  Anyway, I will take a look at &#8220;Vivre Sa Ve.&#8221;  I like your photo selection and I&#8217;m curious about how Godard handles Karina&#8217;s character.  Also I like her fuzzy black coat too!  (And Karina&#8217;s haircut is very chic as well &#8211; very Louis Brooks.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Claude</title>
		<link>http://www.libertasfilmmagazine.com/classic-cinema-obsession-godards-vivre-sa-vie/comment-page-1/#comment-300</link>
		<dc:creator>Claude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2010 18:54:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libertasfilmmagazine.com/?p=2619#comment-300</guid>
		<description>Thank you for this post, Jennifer.  I have often thought that the American obsession with Bardot was misplaced, that the true goddess of French cinema was Karina.  Her face, her eyes ... so exquisitely expressive, redolent of pain and longing.  I&#039;m not sure Godard was ever the same working without her.

Your writing captures the emotion that is, at once, both spoken and unspoken in this most elliptical film of Godard&#039;s.  We are somehow allowed to know everything yet nothing of &#039;Nana.&#039;  A woman leads her tragic life before our eyes, trapped in the the machinery of the sex trade, yet her &#039;true&#039; inner pain is somehow only hinted at, only glimpsed in fleeting moments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for this post, Jennifer.  I have often thought that the American obsession with Bardot was misplaced, that the true goddess of French cinema was Karina.  Her face, her eyes &#8230; so exquisitely expressive, redolent of pain and longing.  I&#8217;m not sure Godard was ever the same working without her.</p>
<p>Your writing captures the emotion that is, at once, both spoken and unspoken in this most elliptical film of Godard&#8217;s.  We are somehow allowed to know everything yet nothing of &#8216;Nana.&#8217;  A woman leads her tragic life before our eyes, trapped in the the machinery of the sex trade, yet her &#8216;true&#8217; inner pain is somehow only hinted at, only glimpsed in fleeting moments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

