<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hollywood Round-up, 7/12</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.libertasfilmmagazine.com/hollywood-round-up-712/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.libertasfilmmagazine.com/hollywood-round-up-712/</link>
	<description>LFM: The Voice of Freedom in Movies &#38; Pop Culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 05:08:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: RalphtheRover</title>
		<link>http://www.libertasfilmmagazine.com/hollywood-round-up-712/comment-page-1/#comment-1093</link>
		<dc:creator>RalphtheRover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 18:21:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libertasfilmmagazine.com/?p=6470#comment-1093</guid>
		<description>K - what are you talking about?  How is this an anti-Tea Party movie?  Not that I&#039;m that excited about the film itself, but I&#039;m curious why you&#039;re seeing this as something political when I see this as yet another science fiction dystopia film.  Frankly, it sounds like a &quot;Logan&#039;s Run&quot; rip-off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>K &#8211; what are you talking about?  How is this an anti-Tea Party movie?  Not that I&#8217;m that excited about the film itself, but I&#8217;m curious why you&#8217;re seeing this as something political when I see this as yet another science fiction dystopia film.  Frankly, it sounds like a &#8220;Logan&#8217;s Run&#8221; rip-off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Apuzzo</title>
		<link>http://www.libertasfilmmagazine.com/hollywood-round-up-712/comment-page-1/#comment-1067</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Apuzzo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 19:30:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libertasfilmmagazine.com/?p=6470#comment-1067</guid>
		<description>Feel free to post a link to your review, Shin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Feel free to post a link to your review, Shin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shinsnake</title>
		<link>http://www.libertasfilmmagazine.com/hollywood-round-up-712/comment-page-1/#comment-1066</link>
		<dc:creator>shinsnake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 19:28:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libertasfilmmagazine.com/?p=6470#comment-1066</guid>
		<description>I wrote a review of Despicable Me on my blog (mondaymorningmovies.wordpress.com) and while my ultimate verdict was that it was clever and a good film, I thought it lacked the simple joy of Pixar&#039;s best and even some of their worst. I definitely welcome competition to Pixar&#039;s well deserved stranglehold on animated movies because competition breeds better films. But I think the jury is still deliberating over whether or not Illumination will make a run at Pixar or just fall by the waste side. Remember, Dreamworks hit it big with Shrek and have done mostly nil since. I liked Despicable Me better as a film than Shrek, so they&#039;re already ahead of Dreamworks in that department, but as for just pure unadulterated fun, Shrek and all of Pixar&#039;s movies could teach a few things to the new guys.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wrote a review of Despicable Me on my blog (mondaymorningmovies.wordpress.com) and while my ultimate verdict was that it was clever and a good film, I thought it lacked the simple joy of Pixar&#8217;s best and even some of their worst. I definitely welcome competition to Pixar&#8217;s well deserved stranglehold on animated movies because competition breeds better films. But I think the jury is still deliberating over whether or not Illumination will make a run at Pixar or just fall by the waste side. Remember, Dreamworks hit it big with Shrek and have done mostly nil since. I liked Despicable Me better as a film than Shrek, so they&#8217;re already ahead of Dreamworks in that department, but as for just pure unadulterated fun, Shrek and all of Pixar&#8217;s movies could teach a few things to the new guys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trojan Horse</title>
		<link>http://www.libertasfilmmagazine.com/hollywood-round-up-712/comment-page-1/#comment-1051</link>
		<dc:creator>Trojan Horse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 07:12:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libertasfilmmagazine.com/?p=6470#comment-1051</guid>
		<description>I simply cannot understand why so much of Hollywood would turn out to support Barbara Boxer.  She has been a disaster for California.  And you raise a good point about film production - where is it?  Hasn&#039;t it plummeted in California thanks to Democrat mismanagement of the state economy?  Why does Hollywood keep supporting these people?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I simply cannot understand why so much of Hollywood would turn out to support Barbara Boxer.  She has been a disaster for California.  And you raise a good point about film production &#8211; where is it?  Hasn&#8217;t it plummeted in California thanks to Democrat mismanagement of the state economy?  Why does Hollywood keep supporting these people?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: K</title>
		<link>http://www.libertasfilmmagazine.com/hollywood-round-up-712/comment-page-1/#comment-1048</link>
		<dc:creator>K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 06:26:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libertasfilmmagazine.com/?p=6470#comment-1048</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt; . . to keep the population in check, people can only stay alive as long as they can pay their way.&lt;/em&gt;

Yay! The first anti-tea-party movie! Because we know those nasty ol tea baggers just want to kill the poor people rather than paying their fair share.  

Let&#039;s see, it took about a year after the tea party emerged to get the first anti-tea party movie. That would mean that we&#039;ve got another 9 months or so before the first anti-illegal-enforcement movie shows up. Or maybe sooner . . 

http://www.traileraddict.com/trailer/machete/trailer</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em> . . to keep the population in check, people can only stay alive as long as they can pay their way.</em></p>
<p>Yay! The first anti-tea-party movie! Because we know those nasty ol tea baggers just want to kill the poor people rather than paying their fair share.  </p>
<p>Let&#8217;s see, it took about a year after the tea party emerged to get the first anti-tea party movie. That would mean that we&#8217;ve got another 9 months or so before the first anti-illegal-enforcement movie shows up. Or maybe sooner . . </p>
<p><a href="http://www.traileraddict.com/trailer/machete/trailer" rel="nofollow">http://www.traileraddict.com/trailer/machete/trailer</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Hollywood Round-up, 7/12 » LFM: Libertas Film Magazine -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.libertasfilmmagazine.com/hollywood-round-up-712/comment-page-1/#comment-1047</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Hollywood Round-up, 7/12 » LFM: Libertas Film Magazine -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 06:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libertasfilmmagazine.com/?p=6470#comment-1047</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Mr. K. Mr. K said: RT @LibertasFilmMag: New LFM Post: Hollywood Round-up, 7/12 ... See: http://bit.ly/8XlfeR [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Mr. K. Mr. K said: RT @LibertasFilmMag: New LFM Post: Hollywood Round-up, 7/12 &#8230; See: <a href="http://bit.ly/8XlfeR" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/8XlfeR</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

