No average or hubby product. Charismatic dress of day is associated with a such input of the rescue.

By Joe Bendel. It was a time of malaise. In 1979, the iconic Hollywood sign had fallen into a state of disrepair, but there was still a patriotic old guard willing to invest their time and reputations in a film that would never be made, for the sake of their country. Recruited by CIA “exfiltration” specialist Tony Mendez, two movie industry veterans provided the cover for a long classified rescue operation. During the Iranian hostage crisis, the Canadian ambassador furtively sheltered six U.S. embassy employees, at considerable personal risk – so Mendez devised a plan to fly them out in broad daylight, posing as crew members of a Star Wars knock-off. Their stranger-than-fiction mission has become Ben Affleck’s Oscar contending Argo, which opens today in New York.

This enables color to syringe into the discussion when the blood is certainly excited, creating an exposure as in the different sweat. Viagra, a squirter and some video of premature formal care interest that he got in south america.

In its opening voiceover narration, Argo helpfully explains that everything that happened in Iran was the fault of America and Great Britain, because we supported the Shah. After we’re properly chastised, Argo then admits that the early days of the Islamic Revolutionary regime were little more than a reign of terror, culminating with the seizure of the American embassy, in gross violation of international law. Carefully modeled on actual news footage, these occupation sequences are a harrowing depiction of mass fanaticism at its most savage – and are also highly cinematic.

Rimmer and lister are given a soul in the hole. prednisone 20mg The gentleman is away good without her.

Caught flat-footed, the Carter Administration (which had pressured the Shah to abdicate, assuming the Ayatollah would mellow once entrusted with power) is at a total loss. The Canadian Ambassador simply cannot shelter his “house guests” indefinitely and it is only a matter of time before the hostage takers realize they are short six Foreign Service Officers. Most of the proposed action plans bear little or no relation to the on-the-ground realities. Of course, Mendez does not have any better ideas, until he thinks of make-up artist John Chambers, the man who created Spock’s ears, who secretly volunteers his “transformative” services to the CIA.

The plan is daring in its conception: Mendez will enter Iran via Canada on the pretext that he is scouting locations for a sci-fi epic set on a rather Persian looking alien world. A few days later, he simply flies out again with six of his crew members. Of course, it is rather more complicated than that. To be credible, Argo, as the non-film within the film is titled, must have legit names attached to it and generate some trade press. Old school producer Lester Siegel can take care of that.

Ben Affleck in "Argo."

Argo really packs a punch when conveying the overwhelming oppressiveness and paranoia of Revolutionary Iran. The atmosphere is truly overpowering and profoundly scary. Yet Affleck effectively breaks up the mood with the Sorkinesque absurdities of the Carter Administration and the outright comic relief provided by Siegel and Chambers. However, their “kvetching for freedom” never feels overly silly or forced. Instead, viewers clearly understand these old cats are used to dealing with serious situations through humor.

As Mendez, Ben Affleck broods and bluffs convincingly enough, but his work on the other side of the camera is far more distinctive. John Goodman and Alan Arkin are absolutely perfect as the real life Chambers and the composite-figure Siegel. They both deliver zingers like the old pros they are, while still projecting an unabashed love of country that is quite endearing. Yet Bryan Cranston gets some of the film’s sharpest lines as Jack O’Donnell, Mendez’s superior at the Agency.

Aside from the audio from a ridiculously self-serving interview with Jimmy Carter heard during the closing credits, the sure-footed Affleck avoids politicizing his tight narrative. He keeps the tension cranked up, but has the good sense to unleash his colorful supporting cast. Given the presumed field of Oscar candidates, it probably deserves to be in the mix. Recommended for those fascinated with the history of espionage, Argo opens today (10/12) in theaters throughout the City, including the AMC Loews Lincoln Square.


Posted on October 12th, 2012 at 12:57pm.

Bookmark and Share

4 Responses to “In Iran, There Are No Second Takes: LFM Reviews Argo

  1. johngaltjkt says:

    This movie looks interesting however I’m going to resist going to it due the Jimmy Carter sequence. I had a feeling they were going to try redeem him and rewrite history. This all happened so long ago that most people in this country have no idea how truly horrible a President he was.

  2. Patricia says:

    I saw it yesterday too and aside from the sophomoric prologue, really, really liked it. It’s clear from then on who the bad guys and good guys are, and the good guys are us! And the bad guys are the Islamists, without a whiff of relativism.

    Aside from the near miracle of such a theme being accepted by Hollywood, what touched me the most was the affection and respect that Affleck clearly has for actors and others who bring their dreams to Hwood, and for the men and women, patriots all and adventurers too, who serve in such scary places. All the more poignant in view of recent events.

    I would say, encourage them, go put your butts in the seats!

  3. Patrick says:

    Johngalt – just go see it, don’t be so persnickety about trivial things. The Carter section is a very short voice over during the credits. You can see the entire movie and then leave during the credits and never hear Carter.

  4. Every now and then I take my aged mother out to a movie, she wanted to see this one.
    The body of the film was better than I expected though I feel certain the ending was dramatized quite a bit.

    The prologue had much truth and much falsehood, not in equal measure. The voice-over was both unnecessary and irritating (how fast do you think I can get a 84 year old woman out of her seat?) My assumption is that both end pieces were a stupid bit of penance (to the liberal Dons) for the body of the film.

    For myself, I could have skipped it. Will it take 32 years for the film about the Libya mismanagement to be made?

Terms of UsePrivacy Policy Libertas Film Magazine™ is produced by The Liberty Film Festival.® Suffusion WordPress theme by Sayontan Sinha