<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The New, Un-American Wonder Woman?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.libertasfilmmagazine.com/new-un-american-wonder-woman/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.libertasfilmmagazine.com/new-un-american-wonder-woman/</link>
	<description>LFM: The Voice of Freedom in Movies &#38; Pop Culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 05:08:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ronbo</title>
		<link>http://www.libertasfilmmagazine.com/new-un-american-wonder-woman/comment-page-1/#comment-785</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2010 11:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libertasfilmmagazine.com/?p=5284#comment-785</guid>
		<description>I disagree.

 It is obvious even to a moron like Obama that I&#039;m not the author of the article in question.

ALSO, the link to LIBERTAS has been included at the end of three paragraphs. I think you have psychological issues, so I will never visit the website again, much less post anything written here on my blog.

....which is what you wanted anyway - You win - Bye!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree.</p>
<p> It is obvious even to a moron like Obama that I&#8217;m not the author of the article in question.</p>
<p>ALSO, the link to LIBERTAS has been included at the end of three paragraphs. I think you have psychological issues, so I will never visit the website again, much less post anything written here on my blog.</p>
<p>&#8230;.which is what you wanted anyway &#8211; You win &#8211; Bye!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pong</title>
		<link>http://www.libertasfilmmagazine.com/new-un-american-wonder-woman/comment-page-1/#comment-760</link>
		<dc:creator>Pong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 16:56:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libertasfilmmagazine.com/?p=5284#comment-760</guid>
		<description>The point of Big Hollywood seems to be to prove each day that Hollywood is liberal. If they have a second point I haven&#039;t read that yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The point of Big Hollywood seems to be to prove each day that Hollywood is liberal. If they have a second point I haven&#8217;t read that yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derbyshire</title>
		<link>http://www.libertasfilmmagazine.com/new-un-american-wonder-woman/comment-page-1/#comment-759</link>
		<dc:creator>Derbyshire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 15:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libertasfilmmagazine.com/?p=5284#comment-759</guid>
		<description>Um, does anybody notice that Big Hollywood is starting to look a lot like whatever Libertas looked like ... 24 hours ago?

http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jhudnall/2010/07/02/wonder-woman-reboot-strident-feminism-is-the-problem-not-the-costume/

Obviously you guys are back leading again. :)

Hudnall doesn&#039;t even seem to think WW deserves her own franchise. Every other crappy, second rate male character does, apparently, but for him WW is a &quot;cold,&quot; &quot;feminist&quot; icon.  Um, OK.  Sort of hard to square that with what the Lynda Carter TV show did, but I digress..it&#039;s weird to me that every 2 bit character gets to have a movie, but Hudnall suddenly decides to go to the matt against WW.  A little misogyny there?  I didn&#039;t notice him commenting on the vomit-inducing &quot;Green Hornet&quot; trailer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um, does anybody notice that Big Hollywood is starting to look a lot like whatever Libertas looked like &#8230; 24 hours ago?</p>
<p><a href="http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jhudnall/2010/07/02/wonder-woman-reboot-strident-feminism-is-the-problem-not-the-costume/" rel="nofollow">http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jhudnall/2010/07/02/wonder-woman-reboot-strident-feminism-is-the-problem-not-the-costume/</a></p>
<p>Obviously you guys are back leading again. <img src='http://www.libertasfilmmagazine.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Hudnall doesn&#8217;t even seem to think WW deserves her own franchise. Every other crappy, second rate male character does, apparently, but for him WW is a &#8220;cold,&#8221; &#8220;feminist&#8221; icon.  Um, OK.  Sort of hard to square that with what the Lynda Carter TV show did, but I digress..it&#8217;s weird to me that every 2 bit character gets to have a movie, but Hudnall suddenly decides to go to the matt against WW.  A little misogyny there?  I didn&#8217;t notice him commenting on the vomit-inducing &#8220;Green Hornet&#8221; trailer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Apuzzo</title>
		<link>http://www.libertasfilmmagazine.com/new-un-american-wonder-woman/comment-page-1/#comment-758</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Apuzzo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 14:45:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libertasfilmmagazine.com/?p=5284#comment-758</guid>
		<description>Ronbo, the problem with what you&#039;re doing is that it&#039;s not immediately evident to anyone visiting your site that YOU haven&#039;t written the piece.  I&#039;m aware that you put a link at the bottom, but it really comes across as material you yourself have written - when you haven&#039;t.  I don&#039;t understand why you can&#039;t do what approximately 99.99% of people on the internet do, which is simply indicate in the &lt;em&gt;body of the article&lt;/em&gt; that this is something you read somewhere else.

I&#039;m going to continue calling you out until you stop doing this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ronbo, the problem with what you&#8217;re doing is that it&#8217;s not immediately evident to anyone visiting your site that YOU haven&#8217;t written the piece.  I&#8217;m aware that you put a link at the bottom, but it really comes across as material you yourself have written &#8211; when you haven&#8217;t.  I don&#8217;t understand why you can&#8217;t do what approximately 99.99% of people on the internet do, which is simply indicate in the <em>body of the article</em> that this is something you read somewhere else.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m going to continue calling you out until you stop doing this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronbo</title>
		<link>http://www.libertasfilmmagazine.com/new-un-american-wonder-woman/comment-page-1/#comment-755</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 09:26:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libertasfilmmagazine.com/?p=5284#comment-755</guid>
		<description>I posted a picture and three paragraphs of your article on my blog with a link back to you:

http://ronbosoldier.blogspot.com/2010/07/anti-american-wonder-woman.html

I hope this meets with your approval.

I visit this website daily and I&#039;m pleased that Patriots such as yourself are putting Leftist Hollywood to task for their obvious bias in movie making.

SIC SEMPER TYRANNIS! --RONBO</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I posted a picture and three paragraphs of your article on my blog with a link back to you:</p>
<p><a href="http://ronbosoldier.blogspot.com/2010/07/anti-american-wonder-woman.html" rel="nofollow">http://ronbosoldier.blogspot.com/2010/07/anti-american-wonder-woman.html</a></p>
<p>I hope this meets with your approval.</p>
<p>I visit this website daily and I&#8217;m pleased that Patriots such as yourself are putting Leftist Hollywood to task for their obvious bias in movie making.</p>
<p>SIC SEMPER TYRANNIS! &#8211;RONBO</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Apuzzo</title>
		<link>http://www.libertasfilmmagazine.com/new-un-american-wonder-woman/comment-page-1/#comment-749</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Apuzzo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 01:54:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libertasfilmmagazine.com/?p=5284#comment-749</guid>
		<description>Let me stress here: I happen to &lt;em&gt;like&lt;/em&gt; the redesign, myself.  It did not scream &#039;un-American&#039; to me.  And I completely understand the need to freshen these things up every once in a while.  But I would just point out - and perhaps I should&#039;ve mentioned this in the post - that the people doing the new &lt;em&gt;Captain America &lt;/em&gt;managed to successfully &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.libertasfilmmagazine.com/hollywood-round-up-63-64/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;freshen up that costume&lt;/a&gt; up while preserving its uniquely American iconography.  So these things &lt;em&gt;can&lt;/em&gt; be done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me stress here: I happen to <em>like</em> the redesign, myself.  It did not scream &#8216;un-American&#8217; to me.  And I completely understand the need to freshen these things up every once in a while.  But I would just point out &#8211; and perhaps I should&#8217;ve mentioned this in the post &#8211; that the people doing the new <em>Captain America </em>managed to successfully <a href="http://www.libertasfilmmagazine.com/hollywood-round-up-63-64/" rel="nofollow">freshen up that costume</a> up while preserving its uniquely American iconography.  So these things <em>can</em> be done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Apuzzo</title>
		<link>http://www.libertasfilmmagazine.com/new-un-american-wonder-woman/comment-page-1/#comment-748</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Apuzzo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 01:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libertasfilmmagazine.com/?p=5284#comment-748</guid>
		<description>OK, fine, it&#039;s the &#039;Lasso of Truth&#039; ... but have you seen how she wields that thing?  Even &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wonder_woman&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Wikipedia&lt;/a&gt; says this about this about her &#039;lasso&#039;:

&quot;Diana wields it with great precision and accuracy, and can use it as a whip or noose.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, fine, it&#8217;s the &#8216;Lasso of Truth&#8217; &#8230; but have you seen how she wields that thing?  Even <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wonder_woman" rel="nofollow">Wikipedia</a> says this about this about her &#8216;lasso&#8217;:</p>
<p>&#8220;Diana wields it with great precision and accuracy, and can use it as a whip or noose.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: K</title>
		<link>http://www.libertasfilmmagazine.com/new-un-american-wonder-woman/comment-page-1/#comment-747</link>
		<dc:creator>K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 00:44:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libertasfilmmagazine.com/?p=5284#comment-747</guid>
		<description>1. Comics are all about hype. On that basis this looks like a very successful change on DC&#039;s part. 

2. A woman (Diane Nelson) is head of DC entertainment? Presumably the comics part is but a small fraction of her domain because 95 percent plus readers are of the male persuasion. That would be like having Hulk Hogan run Teen Vogue. 

3. I see where at least one critical aspect of WW has been maintained - namely her 4 sigma glandular endowments being prominently displayed on the cover. I would have thought Nelson would have had the moral courage to once and for all put down a horribly sexist characteristic which has plagued comics in general and mainstream comics in particular. Mammary objectivification. 

Where&#039;s the passion?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. Comics are all about hype. On that basis this looks like a very successful change on DC&#8217;s part. </p>
<p>2. A woman (Diane Nelson) is head of DC entertainment? Presumably the comics part is but a small fraction of her domain because 95 percent plus readers are of the male persuasion. That would be like having Hulk Hogan run Teen Vogue. </p>
<p>3. I see where at least one critical aspect of WW has been maintained &#8211; namely her 4 sigma glandular endowments being prominently displayed on the cover. I would have thought Nelson would have had the moral courage to once and for all put down a horribly sexist characteristic which has plagued comics in general and mainstream comics in particular. Mammary objectivification. </p>
<p>Where&#8217;s the passion?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maatkare</title>
		<link>http://www.libertasfilmmagazine.com/new-un-american-wonder-woman/comment-page-1/#comment-744</link>
		<dc:creator>maatkare</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 23:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libertasfilmmagazine.com/?p=5284#comment-744</guid>
		<description>Umm...you know Wonder Woman doesn&#039;t use a bullwhip, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Umm&#8230;you know Wonder Woman doesn&#8217;t use a bullwhip, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Looksoverpark</title>
		<link>http://www.libertasfilmmagazine.com/new-un-american-wonder-woman/comment-page-1/#comment-743</link>
		<dc:creator>Looksoverpark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 23:41:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libertasfilmmagazine.com/?p=5284#comment-743</guid>
		<description>One can only sigh and think, what is the [American] world coming to?  Changing Wonder Woman&#039;s costume - please say it isn&#039;t so!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One can only sigh and think, what is the [American] world coming to?  Changing Wonder Woman&#8217;s costume &#8211; please say it isn&#8217;t so!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

