LFM Review: War Horse

By Patricia Ducey. War Horse opens with a rapturous aerial shot of the rolling Devon hills, dotted with neat farms and hedgerows and so achingly verdant that it takes one’s breath away. Soon that transcendent vision of the land as another Eden or demi-paradise gives way to the more intimate image of a mare giving birth in a meadow below, while young Albert Narricott (Jeremy Irvine) watches spellbound from just outside the fence. As the satin-coated foal finds his legs and gambols about, we realize that in one short minute we, like Albert, have fallen totally in love with the spirited youngster. And we know, sadly, something Albert doesn’t: that this idyll will soon be smashed to smithereens.

War Horse‘s story is set in England at the moment before World War I breaks out. In one prideful moment, lovable ne’er-do- well tenant farmer Ted Narricott bids against his hated landlord for the now mature horse at auction. His son Albert is thrilled that his father has brought home the object of his years’ affection and names the horse Joey, but mother Rose (Emily Watson) insists that the horse be sold; a horse as fine as this one must be worthless as a working animal. Albert insists he can train the noble half-thoroughbred to pull a plow; in those desperate economic times, they must plow and plant a rocky field to pay the rent on the farm. The horse soon learns his trade and earns his keep, but a storm later destroys the hard won crop. Thus, finally, Albert’s father Ted (Pete Mullan) is forced to sell the horse. War has broken out, and the British Army snaps up the beautiful animal for its officer corps. Albert bids farewell to his beloved horse – and, for the next hour, we see through Joey’s almond-colored eyes his wartime ordeal on the march to the front lines, all the way to the gut wrenching trench warfare and the terrible climax in No Man’s Land.

War Horse was adapted by British writers Lee Hall (Billy Elliott) and Richard Curtis from a young adult novel, and then Tony-winning play, by British author Michael Morpurgo, which told the story of the Great War through the eyes of a horse and the family that owns him and seemingly loses him. Reportedly, Spielberg saw the play and sewed up the movie deal the next day, even though the schedule interfered with his Tin Tin project.

Jeremy Irvine as Albert, with Joey.

This being a Spielberg film, and a Young Adult offering, sometimes it claws at your heartstrings when a tug would do, and at 146 minutes, is far too long—a few subplots and scenes could be trimmed, to perhaps leave time to explore Albert’s emotional journey as well. The look and sound of the film experience, though, is flawless, thanks in part to Spielberg’s long-time collaborators, cinematographer Janusz Kaminski and production designer Rick Carter, who breathe fire into the director’s storyboards. Their War Horse must be seen as his team’s masterpiece–if 35 mm film is to give way totally to digital, as Kaminski believes, his work here will remain one of its crowning achievements. The magnificent landscapes of Devon, dwarfing its inhabitants, the shimmer of wind through a grove of trees in an eerie pre-battle silence, are but a few of many memorable shots. And special mention must be made of Spielberg’s initial battle scene, when the English mounted battalion charges a German camp. The visual and aural effects are simply spectacular, the sequence a harrowing reminder that men once rode into battle with sabers unleashed, atop steeds at a thundering gallop, straight into an enemy line, and then drew enemy blood in face-to-face combat. And like the classic films he emulates, Spielberg used thousands of extras and hundreds of horses in the battle scenes: no CGI shortcuts here.

Real battle re-enactments: no CGI shortcuts here.

The actors acquit themselves well, and Jeremy Irvine as Albert is affecting. The horse, though, is the star here. Joey is played by several horses, mostly by an American horse named Finder, who also played Seabiscuit. I hope there is an Oscar category for Finder and his trainer, because the horse’s ability to communicate with Albert and with an Army stallion he bonds with is enchanting.

Steven Spielberg delivers here a masterful coming-of-age story, in which the hero’s mettle is tested by war and privation in a world where character is all that remains and all that matters after everything else has been taken. So this is not a cynical or post-modern film; some people may even call the PG-13 War Horse sentimental.  The hipster in your life might insist his sniffles are sniffs of disdain, but in all of history, from the renderings in Chauvet Cave to the little girls (like me once) who sketched profiles of ponies in her notebook in history class, there has always been something about a human that loves a horse. War Horse rightfully earns top tier status in this genre.

So if you or your young adult plans to see War Horse, get thee to the multiplex. This is a film that must be seen in a proper theater, not in a  living room, to appreciate its many gifts.

Posted on January 5th, 2011 at 6:53pm.

Rage in Iran: LFM Reviews The Hunter

By Joe Bendel. To unwind, Ali Alavi spends his weekends in the forest, relying solely on his hunting rifle to provide sustenance. He is not the sort of man to be toyed with. Indeed, when the repressive Iranian state pushes him to his breaking point, he pushes back in the Iranian-born French-based Rafi Pitts’ quietly incendiary The Hunter (trailer here), which opens this Wednesday in New York at the IFC Center.

Alavi is an ex-con, convicted of an unnamed and therefore dubious crime. Forced to work as a late shift security guard, only his reputation as an expert hunter and marksmen affords him a measure of respect from his coworkers. One fateful day, he returns from his hunting trip to find his wife and daughter missing. Over the following weeks, Alavi endures a Kafkaesque nightmare, as the police and various bureaucrats callously keep him waiting hours on end with little or no information.

According to the official story, his wife was killed in the crossfire between the police and so-called “rebels,” as the government refers to the democratic Green movement protestors. It is clear to everyone with eyes that the despised police are responsible, but they refuse to acknowledge culpability. Only the distant hope of finding his daughter keeps the slow-burning Alavi in check. Once her fate is determined, he commits a shocking act of violence Pitts dares viewers to condone.

At this point, Hunter becomes something like a fugitive thriller with more than a touch of the absurd, as two bickering corrupt cops apprehend Alavi in the woods he knows so well, only to get thoroughly lost. It is actually a masterful third act that never goes where you quite expect it to, while remaining true to the grim realities of contemporary Iranian society.

Director Rafi Pitts as Ali Alavi.

Clearly, Alavi’s hunting is a conscious strategy to maintain his masculine self-worth in an emasculating environment. It also makes him dangerous. With his close-cropped hair, wiry build, steely gaze, and 1970’s sports sedan, Pitts, serving as his lead actor, somewhat resembles an Iranian Steve McQueen (the star of 1980’s The Hunter). He is one bad cat, viscerally intense and totally credible in the action-oriented scenes.

Frankly, there is much we can assume about Alavi from what Pitts implies. The greenness of his car and the décor of his home may or may not be coincidental. Yet, unlike many people we observe on the street, he never seems very optimistic about the 2009 election. Perhaps he has seen this all before and suspects what is coming.

Neither a pure thriller nor strictly a naturalistic social protest film, The Hunter could be considered the Iranian version of the Falling Down (the high-water mark of Joel Schumacher’s career). If not an outright call for violent resistance, it explicitly suggests that the pent-up rage of average Iranians is deep and widespread. It ought to chill the Islamist mullahs to their cores. A genuinely powerful and challenging film, The Hunter marks an excellent start to the New Year. Highly recommended, it opens this Wednesday (1/4) in New York at the IFC Center.

Posted on January 3rd, 2011 at 2:42pm.

First Look 2012: LFM Reviews Almayer’s Folly

Aurora Marion as Nina.

By Joe Bendel. Festival season now starts a little earlier. An adaptation of Joseph Conrad’s first novel will be the opening night film of the inaugural edition of the first film fest of the year, and is sure to make critics and scholars sit up and take note. Of course, it is hardly Chantal Akerman’s first film, but it is something of a departure for the Jeanne Dielman, 23 quai du Commerce, 1800 Bruxelles auteur. Fittingly, Akerman’s foray into tropical malaise, Almayer’s Folly, kicks off the first annual First Look series at the Museum of the Moving Image in Astoria.

There is something elusive about Conrad that doggedly resists the transfer to the big screen. Yet his work has been a siren call to filmmakers, resulting in flawed masterworks like Apocalypse Now and Lord Jim. Such is the case with Akerman’s Folly, except less so.

As per Conrad, Kaspar Almayer is an unhappy man. He married the mixed race daughter of his adventurer mentor, Captain Lingard, in hopes of a prospective inheritance. Instead, Lingard has frittered away his fortune and sanity in search of a rumored treasure. Trapped in a loveless and impoverished marriage, Almayer’s only solace is his daughter Nina, but her resentment of westerners’ arrogant and abusive ways very definitely extends to her father.

Set in Malaysia, filmed in Cambodia.

Frankly, learning of a new Conrad film adaptation is sort of like hearing an out of shape friend has entered a marathon. You admire their ambition and hope they pull it off, but remain skeptical. If nothing else, Akerman completely nails the atmosphere of exotic alienation. Watching Folly will make viewers feel like a corpulent western expatriate sweating profusely in a cream-colored suit. However, a little of that humid torpor goes a long way.

Clearly, Folly was conceived as a mood piece, but the narrative slack is awfully conspicuous. At times the cast seem more like props for Akerman to pose than actors interpreting characters. Still, Aurora Marion palpably radiates bitterness and contempt as Nina and Stanislas Merhar has some quietly forceful moments as Almayer.

Set in Malaysia but filmed in Cambodia, Folly is indeed something of a mixed bag. Yet it is undeniably intriguing to watch a filmmaker of Akerman’s stature take on the enigmatic Conrad. While it can certainly drag in-the-moment, it is a fascinating film to look back on as a whole. Of note to serious cineastes, Folly is an impressively high profile launch for the first ever First Look. It screens once and only once (second looks are up to somebody else) this Friday (1/6), with Akerman in attendance at the Museum of the Moving Image’s historic Paramount Studio home.

Posted on January 3rd, 2011 at 2:40pm.